According to the 2000 Census, the majority of Haywood County’s population was female (52.1 percent). If trends continue, this majority will continue to grow — markedly. Thus, one glaring observation, as one surveys the leadership positions in the County — is the absence of women.

A quick analysis reflects that more than 95 percent of the top elected and appointed positions are filled by (white) males. So much, then, for “representation,” as well as diversity.

The Economic Development ad hoc panel sponsored by the County Government was essentially devoid of any female members. The resulting revamped Economic Development Commission is all male, with the exception of the head of the county’s Employment Security office, who just happens to be female. It appears that the new permanent director will be a white male. I understand that the leading candidates for the top position at the Haywood County Chamber of Commerce are male. The (white) male dominated county government was compounded by the employ of the assistant county manager a few years ago and the newly employed communications officer. Weren’t there any qualified females for either of these positions? The county attorney, county manager, assistant county manager, communications officer, head of DSS, superintendent of schools, and the head of the board of elections, among others, are all (white) males. With few exceptions, all key board and government executive positions are filled by a white male, while the majority of the county’s population is female. A corporate business would have significant problems with that sort of hiring or staffing practice — and an issue of social responsibility (and accountability) as well.

There are few visible signs of any affirmative action efforts on the part of the government or quasi-government entities to promote diversity. This is indeed disappointing given the large number of highly educated, experienced and resourceful females in the county — augmented by viable applicants, which one may have to proactively seek out (which is affirmative action) — outside the county. It is not a valid reason (excuse) to say that none applied. That has never flown in the corporate sector, and it certainly shouldn’t in government where public funds are being used.

Not only does the white male profile not represent the composition of the county, it will pose an ever-growing problem in recruiting businesses from outside the area. Diversity is important to most successful companies, and they make proactive efforts to achieve such diversity. In addition to underrepresented females, we have minority groups — African-Americans, Latinos and Asians — that have virtually no representation at all. Are there not any places at the table and roles where their voice and views would add value?

Are we really content with the county’s complexion that we project? How do those looking in — such as business prospects — see us? That’s something to think about, but, more importantly, something to rectify. I — and others — would like to see the chamber of commerce and the Economic Development Commission (the latter funded entirely with public funds) take proactive steps to recruit qualified females for the open leadership positions. Hopefully, this will set an example and tone for future considerations and efforts. I have witnessed highly successful females elsewhere in both of these roles. Other organizations — especially those funded by tax dollars — such as the Haywood Advancement Foundation should follow suit. Do they really believe that there aren’t any qualified females or minorities who can serve in these capacities?

There is much talk about and (hopefully) attention to creating new jobs in Haywood County. But for many, this means jobs for (white) males. We need to create and perpetuate a culture where the daughters as well as the sons of Haywood County can take their place in key leadership roles.

Because, in a lot of circles within the county, the good ole boy mentality continues to reign.

If overt efforts aren’t made to remedy this very glaring inequity, then the female voters, and those who view diversity as important, should speak up at the polls.

Lee E. Shelton
Maggie Valley
lshelto@gsb.uchicago.edu