Still
taking aim at the big buffalo By
Scott McLeod
It
ain’t so just because people say it, even when they say it
over and over.
Few areas of local government exhibit this truth more than the
field of economic development. For several years now those who pay
attention have been hearing leaders say that the great buffalo hunt
is over. The buffalo, in this context, is the huge 500-job plant
or 1,000-employee factory. No one believes they have a chance of
landing economic development projects of this size. With most of
those projects going overseas, everyone promises to spend more energy
and time recruiting the smaller companies.
While our leaders are feeding us this line, Dell Computers starts
sniffing around for a location to build a new factory and all of
a sudden Gov. Mike Easley and legislative leaders go into a frenzied
pursuit unlike anything ever witnessed. Around $242 million in incentives
later, we get a plant that will supposedly employ about 1,500 and
spin off other jobs. The Dell jobs themselves will pay somewhere
in the neighborhood of $25,000 to $30,000 per year.
I’ve said before that the deal offered to Dell was too sweet
by far, and there are plenty of people who agree with that assessment.
The publisher of Southern Business and Development magazine, a trade
publication for economic development professionals, says North Carolina
gave away too much.
“While we don’t know exactly how the incentive package
North Carolina offered Dell is set up, we do know exactly the history
of large incentive packages given out to companies that have announced
big deals in the South since 1992. That being the case, North Carolina
paid too much for the Dell deal,” SB&D publisher Mike Randle
told a researcher for the John Locke Foundation, a conservative
think tank based in Raleigh.
The Dell deal is so large and outlandish that it is an easy target
for criticism. But this deal, in particular, is not the real problem.
When there is a chance to land these huge job producers, perhaps
we should go after them.
What is not happening in North Carolina is a real commitment to
incentives to help small businesses create jobs. That’s a
problem that no one seems interested in tackling.
Just last week I heard about one of those small companies, one
that with a few incentives or tax breaks would likely create a few
dozen jobs very quickly. This man had a small business in Florida,
sold it, and came to the mountains with plans to open a couple of
small businesses. If his dream works out, he’ll likely have
30 or so employees within a couple of years.
What’s interesting is that this guy, like most others, isn’t
asking for help. He’s under the radar, so to speak. Economic
development officials almost certainly don’t know he exists.
And the reason is simple: there aren’t any incentives for
him and others like him, so they don’t go looking for them.
But what if, for example, the state and federal governments promised
a year’s tax credit for all new jobs created, not just those
created by large companies like Dell. That’s just one idea,
but it would represent a real incentive for the companies that have
two or three employees. It would help that business succeed and
grow.
Right now in the mountains the realization of how little help
there is for small businesses is really hitting home. The flood
wiped out dozens of small companies, and many of them are finding
that the only government aid is a loan. FEMA pumps millions into
rebuilding homes but for the mom-and-pop businesses there is nothing.
There are no real tax benefits and no employee-based or job-recreation
incentives. Thankfully in Haywood County commissioners came up with
a small pool of money to provide one-time emergency grants to some
of these businesses (see accompanying article).
Incentives for small companies would serve another purpose. If
you had to file paperwork at your local economic development office
to get a tax credit, then local officials whose job it is to help
stimulate job growth would learn about all these businesses. The
local EDC could become a clearinghouse for information that would
help it do just what its name implies.
So we can talk about taking steps to actively help small businesses
create jobs, boost payroll and help local economies, but it is going
to require direct action by the state and a renewed emphasis by
local governments to make it a reality. What we all want is a business
environment that encourages entrepreneurship and creativity. Small,
dynamic companies are the future of our economy. For decades, nearly
all of our economic development incentives have ignored this type
of business, but it is time to develop an array of tax breaks and
other community-based incentives that are aimed specifically at
small businesses. Right now many are talking about the need but
not doing anything about it.