I
learned, when I worked full-time for the Smoky Mountain News, that
it helps if newspaper writers are thick-skinned. It doesn’t
matter if you’re writing an op-ed piece, a feature or a news
story. There will be someone somewhere who disagrees or doesn’t
like it and may resort to calling you names.
But I was a little surprised last Wednesday (Jan. 11) when I opened
a copy of the SMN to find that my friends, er, associates, there
had decided I was a nerd. “Holiday Bird Nerd Diary”
read the bold headline across my column regarding this year’s
Balsam Christmas Bird Count.
Etymology: perhaps from nerd, a creature in the children’s
book If I Ran the Zoo (1950) by Dr. Seuss (Theodor Geisel): an unstylish,
unattractive, or socially inept person; especially: one slavishly
devoted to intellectual or academic pursuits” from the Merriam
Webster online dictionary.
I generally spend Monday evenings proofing the SMN, but because
of an especially virulent stomach bug my 4-year-old passed along
to Mommy and Daddy, I was otherwise occupied that Monday (Jan. 9).
I regret I did not proof that Monday. Not because of the gratuitous
label my friends, er, colleagues at SMN decided to bestow upon me,
but because I wasn’t able to correct an error in the column.
The Lake Junaluska crew actually recorded 55 species rather than
the 50 reported in the piece.
Now, I can assure (I think) the other 21 participants in this
year’s Balsam CBC and the other 80 million or so birders across
the U.S. that my friends, er, acquaintances at SMN were not intent
on disparaging them. It’s just that these are people who don’t
know house finches from house sparrows and don’t understand
our hobby.
So who are those bird nerds out there?
• Number of birders in United States in 2004: 85.2 million.
• Number of birders in United States in 1983: 21 million.
• Percentage who are female: 56
• Percentage who are ages 16-24: 16
• Percentage who are ages 25-39: 24
• Percentage who are ages 40-59: 37
• Percentage who are older than 60: 23
• Percentage who hold college degrees: 28
• Percentage who earn more than $50,000 a year: 47
My source for these numbers is the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Forest Service’s National Survey on Recreation and Environment,
which was completed in 2000. The total number of birders is from
a 2004 updated survey by the Forest Service.
And what are some of the economic and scientific impacts bird
nerds have?
Economics:
• Each year, nongame wildlife appreciation in the United
States generates a total economic return of $20 billion (USDI Survey,
1993). The largest part is contributed by bird enthusiasts.
• A total of $3 billion was spent in 1991 on equipment
and supplies for nongame wildlife appreciation activities. (USDI
Survey, 1993)
• Annually, more than $1 billion is spent on birdseed,
feeders, baths, and nesting boxes. (USDI Survey, 1993)
• The average birder annually spends more than $350 on
travel and paraphernalia related to birdwatching. Committed birders
spend much more, on average. Active birders annually spend about
$2,000 on birdwatching, with half that amount on travel, i.e. avitourism.
(Wiedner and Kerlinger, 1990)
• In 1991, 24 million Americans took trips for the express
purpose of viewing and photographing wild birds. They spent $2.5
billion on trip-related expenses, including $1.5 billion on food
and lodging. (USDI Survey, 1993)
• Cape May, New Jersey: More than 100,000 birders visit
this area annually, providing a cumulative impact of nearly $10
million. (Kerlinger and Wiedner, 1991).
• High Island, Texas: In 1992, more than 6,000 birders
visitors this small Gulf Coast town. They spent $2.5 million directly
in the community, and generated a total regional economic impact
of about $6 million. (Eubanks, Kerlinger, and Payne, 1993).
• Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia: The
economic impact to the local community by wildlife viewers in 1994
was nearly $10 million. (Kerlinger, 1994).
• Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Pennsylvania: More than 50,000
visitors each year contribute more than $4 million to the local
economy. (Kerlinger and Brett, 1990).
Source: International Migratory Bird Day Organizer’s Packet,
Sharing Your Passion for Birds.
Science:
• Using data from Birds in Forested Landscapes, the Lab
of Ornithology published A Land Manager’s Guide to Improving
Habitat for Scarlet Tanagers and Other Forest-interior Birds in
1999.
• Acid rain has had a strong negative effect on the likelihood
that wood thrushes attempt to breed in some regions. The data on
wood thrushes were based on the Birds in Forested Landscapes project
and the Breeding Bird Survey (Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, 2002, 99:11235–11240).
• Tree swallows have begun laying eggs on average about
9 days earlier over the past 30 years, apparently in response to
climate change. Researchers used 3,450 records from the Cornell
Lab of Ornithology’s North American Nest Record Card Program
(1970 to 1992) and 5 nest record programs in Canada. (Proceedings
of the Royal Society of London Series B, 1999, 266: 2487-2490)
• Some 180 million fewer house finches exist today than
would have if they had never been exposed to the house finch eye
disease. The disease appears to be regulating the numbers of house
finches in some regions. The findings were based on data collected
by participants of the House Finch Disease Survey and Audubon’s
Christmas BirdCount (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
2000, 97:5303–5306). Data from Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
I also learned, while working full time at SMN that it’s
the computer geeks and desk jockeys who have the last say and since
the geeks and jockeys have “outed” me I have only one
recourse. I’ll just go to http://www.whogivesashirt.ca/WGASBN.html
and order one of the above T-shirts. Being a bird nerd isn’t
so bad.