 |
The
Naturalist's Corner
By
Don Hendershot
Humans
are notorious for anthropomorphizing. That is attributing human characteristics
to non-human creatures and objects. Bunnies are cute and cuddly; snakes
are cold and slimy, therefore bunnies are good and snakes are bad.
Biologists, however, are scientists so rather than good
or cuddly and bad or slimy they
couch their anthropomorphisms in scientific terms like beneficial
or pest.
In truth the natural world operates totally outside the anthropocentric
ideals of good and evil. Crocodile or koala, animals simply live their
lives to the best of their ability in the ecological niche they are
adapted to. Their value or worth is intrinsic. Crocodiles are not
bad because they eat koalas. It cant be equated to Hannibal
Lecter stalking his next victim.
I was reminded of natures oblivion to human labeling the other
evening as I watched a bat circling in the full moons glow chasing
insects lured out by the unseasonably warm winter evening. While bats
were once cloaked in superstition and dread, they are generally thought
of today as beneficial or good critters because of the huge numbers
of insects they ingest. These nocturnal bug zappers share the night
skies with another creature, generally thought of as good
in anthropocentric terms; owls.
However, when these two good guys meet in the darkness its generally
bad news for the bat. Owls are one of the few creatures that appear
to regularly prey on bats. In some areas with a high density of owls,
bats exhibit what biologists call lunarphobia. They greatly reduce
their night time activities during bright nights associated with full
moons to lessen the risk of becoming owl food.
Almost any species of owl, or any other predator that feeds on small
mammals, will take a bat given the opportunity. Some species of owls
seem to have a greater proclivity for bats than others. Bay owls and
eastern screech owls have been observed staking out caves where bats
roost and capturing them in flight as they exit.
In a recent post to Carolina Birds listserv, South Carolina state
parks biologist Irvin Pitts noted the results of a survey he conducted
in the fall and winter of 1986 - 1987. Pitts analyzed 27 barred owl
pellets collected from a roost at Pleasant Ridge County Park in Greenville
County, S.C. He found the remains of 61 different animals represented.
Bats (almost exclusively eastern red bats) made up the largest segment
of prey species with 16 individuals.
The fact the majority of bats recorded in Pitts survey were
red bats is probably more attributable to supply and demand than any
kind of bat-preference on the part of the barred owls in questions.
Eastern red bats, Laisiurus borealis, would be the most common bat
active, in that area, during that time of year.
Eastern red bats are year-round residents in the southern US but northern
animals migrate in the fall from their nursery sites in the northern
US and Canada to the southeastern US and northern Mexico where they
hibernate. Eastern red bats are cold hardy and some overwinter as
far north as Ohio. On warm winter evenings male red bats commonly
roust from hibernation to feed.
While not equipped with echolocation like bats, owls are quite suited
to their nocturnal niche. Their large eyes enable them to gather light
giving them great night vision. Binocular vision (both eyes in the
front of their head) allows them to see in three dimensions giving
great depth perception.
The rounded disk-like face actually directs sound waves to the owls
ears. Owls ears are asymmetrical, the right ear being slightly higher
on the head than the left ear. This gives the owl three dimensional
hearing as well as three dimensional sight.
Add these facets to the owls silent flight, created by serrations
along the leading edge of the flight feathers, sharp, strong talons
and hooked beak and you have a very efficient nocturnal predator.
One that makes no moral or ethical distinction when faced with the
prospect of dining on good bats.
(Don Hendershot can be reached at don@smokymountainnews.com) |