| |
<< Back
5/29/02
Scientific
data helps HWA secure grants
By
Don Hendershot
Simply
put, our objective is to reduce the amount of mud in the creeks,
said Gordon Small, project manager Haywood Waterways Association.
Of course when you look at how much mud that is, you get an idea of
the size of the task. HWA used Integrated Pollutant Source Identification
(IPSI) technology from the Tennessee Valley Authority fed into a geographic
information system (GIS) database to identify and quantify sources
of erosion and sedimentation in Haywood County. A graph in HWAs
new Watershed Action Plan summarizes soil movement off-site from several
activities.
According to the graph, the three major soil-loss activities in the
watershed are: eroding streambanks — 400-450 tons of soil lost
per year; newly constructed roads — 200-250 tons per year; and
eroding road banks — 50-100 tons per year.
All that information provides a solid foundation for the grant applications
that send money into Haywood County and helps landowners combat erosion
and runoff problems. And HWA has been highly successful in securing
those grants. To date, the organization has been responsible for securing
$1.4 million for different initiatives and programs in the county.
Some of the larger grants that HWA helped acquire include more than
$677,000 from Clean Water Management Trust Fund to help reduce erosion
and sediment in the Pigeon River Watershed. Most of that money was
earmarked for projects along Richland Creek. The group also helped
secure more than $500,000 to help pay for dredging efforts at Lake
Junaluska.
Ron Moser, HWA director, said the IPSI survey, coupled with the application
of the GIS technology, was a major accomplishment for HWA.
We were the first to use this technology and it has proved invaluable
in obtaining grant money for the watershed. When we apply for grants
we can give specifics and hard numbers, Moser said.
Collecting the data
The IPSI survey began in April 1999 and was funded through a partnership
with TVA, the Pigeon River Fund and HWA. The initial phase was to
take infrared aerial photographs in the spring before the trees
leafed out. TVA staff interpreted the photos to identify nonpoint
source pollution. The areas showing pollution were digitized using
a GIS format so they could be identified and placed on a map.
While the IPSI and GIS technology have proven greatly beneficial
for HWA, much critical data is still collected the old-fashioned
way. Twenty-four volunteers collect water samples once a month at
sites across the county as part of the VWIN (volunteer water information
network) program. The samples are analyzed by the Environmental
Quality Institute, which is a part of the University of North Carolina
at Asheville. EQI produces an annual report each year ranking the
waterways tested.
Water quality across the Haywood watershed is extremely variable.
It ranges from excellent (East and West Fork of Pigeon River at
Bethel) to poor (Pigeon River at Hepco Bridge; Cove Creek at N.C.
209) to 303(d) state-listed impaired waters (areas of Hyatt Creek.)
But the Haywood watershed is unique. The headwaters of the watershed
are all within the county. No other jurisdiction can impact the
water quality in Haywood County. The water quality issues in the
county are created by the residents (corporate residents included)
of the county.
Small sees this as a great advantage for the county.
It means we can fix it, he said.
Local residents are expressing more and more concern. They
take these issues to heart. Were moving in the right direction,
but it is a slow, painful process.
Barry Stevens, district soil conservationist, said many landowners
in the district were taking advantage of various incentives to help
control erosion on their property. Stevens said approximately 13
property owners were taking advantage of Clean Water Management
Trust Fund grants and another 19 were utilizing EPA 319 grants.
We work hard to educate the public. As the public becomes
more educated they become more involved, Moser said.
HWA has recently undertaken a project at Balsam Meadows subdivision
that Small believes can serve as a model for other developments
in the watershed.
Balsam Meadows is a classic example of poor management. Water
gets in the roads and washes them out. Water cuts roadside ditches
and carries the sediment directly into the creek. There are no culverts
or energy dissipaters, Small said.
Small said the developer at Balsam Meadows went bankrupt, leaving
property owners holding the bag. According to Small, HWA, with the
help of district soil and water conservationists, plan to implement
best management practices (BMP) and proper landscaping and engineering
design to remedy the problems at Balsam Meadows.
Balsam Meadows will provide a great demonstration site. There
are real problems, but the parcel is small enough that we can manage
it, Small said.
Stevens said the project could probably be completed in two months.
Some of the improvements would include waterbreaks in the roads,
culverts and rock dams in the ditches to dissipate the energy and
slow the water down. Stevens estimates the cost of the project at
$25,000.
The Balsam Meadows project ties in wonderfully with HWAs new
Watershed Action Plan, said Moser. It will provide a setting for
HWA to demonstrate some of the recommended strategies for improving
and maintaining water quality developed by their Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) and published in the plan.
Small sees HWAs goal to be a catalyst to provide educational,
financial and technical support throughout the watershed to help
achieve the groups basic mission of maintaining and/or improving
water quality throughout the county.
Small and other members of HWA staff have presented the Watershed
Action Plan to the county and municipal governments in the watershed
and received their endorsement. Moser said the action plan, political
support, educational programs, the TAC, VWIN and demonstrably successful
projects all join together to make HWA a highly effective tool for
improving water quality in Haywood County.
|
|