 |
Symbols
– like flags – do mean something
By
Lee Shelton
There
was a letter to the editor in last Wednesdays Enterprise Mountaineer
concerning a North Carolina flag that was being flown upside down
at an area lodging facility. The writer indicated that when she advised
the establishment, the person with whom she spoke said that it looked
OK to him. That raises the questions: how many people noticed that
the flag was upside down, and how many of them cared? How many people
could describe their own state flag and its components, as well as
explain the respective meanings? What is a flag really intended to
accomplish? All 50 states have a flag, as do a number of municipalities
and various organizations. What is their intended purpose and relative
importance? What does our state flag say?
My contemplation of similar questions began several months ago when
I learned that the Mississippi town where I was born and raised had
recently designed a municipal flag. I reflected on this with some
degree of trepidation and unease. The issue of the Georgia state flag
had risen again from its shallow grave, with the prospects of three
different flags within a two- year period, and they continue to wrangle
with the issue at the state level in Mississippi. Disagreement and
discord continues concerning the display of the Confederate Flag at
the state capitol in Columbia, South Carolina.
So, with that backdrop, I did not know what to expect, but I wasnt
optimistic. That is because I grew up in what has been called the
most Southern Place on Earth — home to Byron Dela Beckwith
and a major center of the (White) Citizens Council. I attended elementary
school only 5 miles from Bryants Store in Money, Miss., where
Emmett Till had the encounter that led to his murder. The list could
go on. So, with the pressure to remove the bars and stars
from the state flag, what could be their motive to develop a municipal
flag — now?
The flag was designed by an architect in the town. Notably absent
was any vestige of the Confederate States of America. Instead, a waving
Old Glory was the focal point under the ubiquitous Cotton Boll.
I phoned a government official that I know and asked whether or not
this had been a controversial issue; how emotional and heated did
the discourse get? How, given what was going on with the state flag,
and being — well, Greenwood, Mississippi — could they
not include any symbolism of the Confederate States of America? He
replied: Lee, the Civil War is over. We have a good historical
museum, but we are now focusing on the future and its opportunities
and challenges. In order to be successful we must be unified. This
flag is a small gesture towards that goal. The flag is a statement
of who we are, what our values are, and a representation of unity.
It is a flag that everyone who lives here can rally around. It is
a way to distance ourselves from the unproductive furor over the state
flag, and, hopefully, will set an example for others to follow. We
need to move forward. I was rather stunned but quite pleased,
to say the least. The folks in Greenwood understood what flags are
for.
They got it right. The flag is symbolic, representing and signifying
to those within and without what is important. The symbols take the
place of words. The flag and underlying symbols are also intended
to be a unifier. If that is the case, then why is there all the dissension
and rancor over the aforementioned state flags? Perhaps they
have missed the point.
I also attended the University of Mississippi in the 1960s. You know,
the Ole Miss Rebels, as in Rebel Flag. Home
of the University Greys — comprised of the 150-member senior
class, which in a dorm room in 1861 formed Company A of the Eleventh
Mississippi Regiment of Volunteer Infantry. All of them — the
entire senior class of the University — died during the Civil
War, the vast majority on July 3, 1863, at Gettysburg. From one historians
writings, On July 3, 1863, an Ole Miss student dipped a death
message to his mother in his own blood and died. During the
war, the Lyceum at the University served as a hospital and the observatory
as a morgue. A cemetery on campus is a vivid reminder of what took
place.
So, it is notable that years ago the university took proactive measures
to prohibit the display of the Confederate Flag on campus, and especially
at sporting events. If there were ever a logical place to wave the
Confederate Flag, it is at Ole Miss. But, I would advise you not to
do so. The town of Oxford, Miss., home to the University — burned
to the ground by Gen. Sherman in 1863 — is also following suit.
So, if Greenwood and Ole Miss can figure out what a flag is for —
and what it is not for — why cant the State of Mississippi
and the State of South Carolina, among others?
Lets briefly consider the Confederate Flag in this context.
A segment of the population in South Carolina, Georgia and Mississippi
assert that the flag is a symbol of heritage and pride; that it is
not intended to be divisive. Another large segment says that it is
divisive. So, who is right? If state symbols are to be inclusive,
then there is a problem if such a large percentage of the population
believes that the flag is not inclusive — for whatever reason.
Go back to the drawing board. There are numerous symbols and statements
of identity that can be included that do not conjure up this divisiveness;
so why use the ones that do?
A large number of the ancestors of African Americans in these Southern
States were in bondage during the period that the Confederate Flag
was in use. That is a sound foundation on which to assert that this
symbol is clearly not inclusive, coupled, of course, with the direct
correlation to the Klu Klux Klan.
This is exacerbated by the fact the southern states, such as Georgia
and Mississippi, only added the stars and bars to the state flag,
or in the case of South Carolina hoisted the Confederate Flag, during
the late 1950s and the early 1960s in defiance of Civil Rights legislation.
This makes the heritage argument even weaker, compounded by the fact
that a lot of folks in the pro-flag segment know very little about
the Confederate Flag that they are promoting.
The flag that is referred to as the Confederate Flag,
is actually the Confederate Navy Jack, which was first used in 1863.
This was the flag used by the Klu Klux Klan in its initial stages,
which became the symbol of the organization. If South Carolina had
wanted to fly the Confederate Flag, then why not fly the official
Confederate Flag, the third iteration of which was approved in March
1865, only a month prior to Lees surrender? I guess the Confederate
Government had little to do in those waning weeks but design a new
flag. But I question the purity of South Carolinas intentions.
This was in essence giving the raspberry to the African-American citizens
and effectively the rest of the country.
Those who display the flag around here refer to it as the Battle
Flag, but it isnt. It is also the Navy Jack (how many
of their ancestors served in the Confederate Navy?). Further, the
individual states in the Confederacy were loosely cobbled together
and had a distaste of federalism, even during the course of the war.
Thus, a number of the states and fighting regiments used their own
flag. The Bonnie Blue Flag was used by a number of Mississippi regiments,
as it was selected as the state flag upon secession. There was not
one official battle flag, contrary to assertions otherwise.
When the Bonnie Blue Flag was raised over the Capitol Building in
Jackson, Miss., Harry MacCarthy wrote a song by the same name, which
became the second most popular song of the Confederacy. This flag
was adopted in some form by five of the Southern states that changed
flags upon secession in 1861. Also there was no flag manufacturer
in the South during the Civil War. It was a cottage industry, and
often two flags made by the same person looked different. The Southern
Cross — or stars and bars — was first used by the
Army of Northern Virginia. Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard proposed adopting
a version of the St. Andrews Cross as the standard battle flag of
the Confederate army, but it never was. Admittedly, others did use
it; but, many did not — they once again used their own flag.
Consequently, Confederate soldiers served and died under a number
of flags, the fewest of which were most likely under the Navy Jack.
The Battle Flag of Northern Virginia included the St. Andrews Cross
encasing 13 stars — 11 for the states that seceded and two for
Kentucky and Missouri. The St. Andrews Cross was popular in the South
given the large Scottish ancestry.
St. Andrews, of course, is the patron saint of Scotland, who was crucified
on a cross in the shape of an X. The Battle Flag was square in shape,
as are most battle flags, as opposed to the rectangle shape of the
Navy Jack. Thus, the Confederate flag hanging around these parts is
neither an official flag of the Confederate States of America nor
the battle flag.
So are flag referenda a good idea, as a number of states are taking
that route? No, they arent. Our form of government is predicated
on the protection of minority rights, and rights for all its citizens.
The Founding Fathers were very concerned about the tyranny of
the majority — and the emotional tides of populism —
and established the government with these concerns vividly in mind.
In these flag referenda, the minority interests are subjugated to
the majority. Thus, it is attendant upon the elected officials to
develop a symbol that is all-inclusive. To disenfranchise such a large
percentage of the population in an endeavor intended to unify, just
doesnt hunt, in Mississippi parlance.
To close, lets look briefly at the history of flags and again
at their intended purpose. Flags have been around for thousands of
years. They were first referred to as a vexilloid, which is from Latin,
meaning to guide (vexillology is the scientific study
of flags). It was originally believed that they had magical powers.
At first they were metal or wooden poles with carvings on top. About
2,000 years ago, pieces of fabric or material were added for decoration,
somewhat resembling the flags of today. Flags in battle were important
as they helped distinguish friend from foe, and identify certain dignitaries
and leaders.
They were — and are — a way to communicate with symbols.
They are designed to tell the viewer something about the bearer and
identify the bearer as part of a specific group. They are also intended
to be a rallying point — rally around the flag —
for those under its domain.
So, what is displaying the Confederate Flag as a State Symbol in the
21st Century saying? Why would we have symbols that are divisive if
an important intent is one of inclusiveness — saying
this is who we are, these are our common bonds and values?
So, then deciding what should not go into a flag design should be
easy. Deciding what to include and what to communicate may take more
time, but identifying something more appropriate should not be a problem.
Whatever the flag says, it should be about all the citizens, not just
a segment, even if it is the largest segment.
The United States Flag is a great example. It consists of 13 horizontal
stripes — representing the original 13 colonies — seven
red alternating with 6 white. In the canton (corner) is a blue field
representing a new constellation to which these 13 stripes are giving
way. Each State of the Union is reflected by one star, of which, there
are now 50. The colors are symbolic as well. The red symbolizes hardiness
and valor; white symbolizes purity and innocence and blue represents
vigilance, perseverance and justice. There is one more red than white
stripe, conveying that we are a peace-loving country but, if provoked,
we will defend our freedom. We are peaceful and innocent but unafraid.
Thus, in its simplicity, it says a lot. And it is all-inclusive.
Other good examples would include the International Olympic Flag with
the interlocking five rings, signifying the coming together of the
five continents in harmony, and the U.N. Flag displaying the olive
branch of peace. They are simple but clear in statement — and
they are inclusive.
Thus, the right thing to do concerning Confederate symbols in state
flags and crests is clear. It just requires reasoned judgment and
leadership — qualities found, at least on this matter, in Greenwood,
Miss., and at Ole Miss, of all places.
(Lee Shelton lives in Maggie Valley and works as a financial and
development consultant. He can be reached a
lshelto@gsb.uchicago.edu) |