Here’s
what is wrong with the debates By
Marshall Frank
As
of this writing, five presidential debates — three Republican
and two Democratic — have been held, ostensibly offering the
American people a chance at learning the positions of each candidate
and to evaluate their presidential gravitas. This is one voter who
is extremely disappointed. Here are 10 reasons why:
1) Too many candidates with too little time to respond to so many
important issues. This frustrates viewers as well as the participants.
The citizenry needs more than sound bites for such vital topics
as the Iraq war and immigration. Ten to eight candidates dilute
the available opportunity for quality responses Debates should be
scheduled for no more than five candidates at a time, then double
the number of debates.
2) Frontrunners get the spotlight — which they already have
anyway — making the presidential race a media event. This
is a time when voters have an opportunity to weigh the positions
of lesser known candidates, yet moderators target the likes of McCain,
Giuliani, Clinton and Obama for the lion’s share of questions.
Candidates like Ron Paul and Mike Gravel stand as potted plants,
hoping for a morsel or two to come their way, and we — the
voters — are deprived of learning more about them.
3) Audience questions, while worthwhile, should be screened for
substance. Precious little time is available, yet candidates are
forced to answer innocuous questions such as “What does it
mean to be an American?” This provides nothing more than opportunities
for grandstanding and means nothing otherwise.
4) Way too much emphasis on religion. The constant questions about
individual faith forces candidates to assert their politically correct
beliefs in God, and how much religion plays a role in their personal
and professional lives. Any candidate who professes otherwise would
be committing political suicide, and they all know that. Their responses
are predictable, so what is there to evaluate?
5) Over-emphasis on abortion. Whether or not a presidential candidate
is pro-life or pro-choice will have no bearing on the future of
a free America, or on our national security, or our economy, or
any other issue that will impact the lives of our children and grandchildren.
It’s simply a hot-button issue that appeals to special interest
groups on both sides.
6) While questions abound about international terrorism, very
little is focused on the rising influence of radical Islam within
the borders of the United States. Recent polls suggest that one-fourth
of young male Muslims in America support the indiscriminate killings
of civilians by suicide bombers. Such youngsters will likely form
a substantial army of future terrorists on the domestic front. Politicians
all know how much radical Wahhabi money from Saudi Arabia is pouring
into our universities, prisons and mosques, yet no one addresses
this dark and looming issue. This is a problem which future generations
in America will be facing but it’s politically incorrect for
both the media and our politicians to address.
7) While half the debates are centered on Iraq and immigration,
very little is centered on the potential crises in North Korea,
Taiwan, Darfur, Israel, Chechnya, or worse — the declining
relations between the U.S. and the western hemisphere, namely, Venezuela,
Cuba and Bolivia.
How would each candidate feel about lifting the Cuban embargo,
and establish trade with the communist nation, much the same as
we trade with China?
8) Crime remains safely under the rug. No attention is paid to
it. Yet, the United States houses more than 2 million inmates in
its prisons while multi-millions more are filtered through the criminal
justice system one way or another. At least $100 billion a year
is expended in a losing effort toward fighting the illicit drug
problem, not to mention another $100 billion in ancillary medical
and welfare costs. Millions of lives are wasted in prisons, morgues
and hospital wards combating a problem which is not much different
than the prohibition issue of the 1920s, yet no one dares to raise
the issue. Out of sight, out of mind.
9) Stem cell research. I’ve yet to hear one question asked
of a candidate about their position on federal funding for the cure
of horrible diseases and saving lives. Yet, in six years this is
the only bill which the current president has vetoed, all in the
interest of political pay-back to his fundamentalist base. It’s
another hot button issue which is politically incorrect, no matter
which side of the fence they sit. We — the voters —
remain in the dark, while sufferers remain suffering.
10) Homeland Security. Where are the questions? Almost six years
after 9/11, containers in our ports remain un-inspected. The borders
remain insecure. Al Qaeda is riding piggy-back on illegal immigrants
entering through our southern border. Radical Islamic forces are
making serious inroads inside the nation’s infrastructure.
Why are there no air marshals on every domestic flight? Why are
security personnel prohibited from profiling young mid-east passengers
on airline flights, while little grannys from Oklahoma get body
searched?
Here’s what it means to be an American: It means caring
about our kids, our grandkids, and their kids, and how we can set
the stage for a more secure and better life for them, just like
our ancestors did for us. And to do that, we must demand answers
from our potential leaders that are of substance and consequence.
Too bad that’s not happening.
(Marshall Frank is a retired Miami-Dade homicide detective
and a novelist. He can be reached at mlf283@aol.com.)