| |
<< Back
8/7/02
The
predators are often painfully familiar
By
Dawn Gilchrist-Young
So
I put my soul to bed by itself,
so far away that as a woman I still
cant
find it, and waited to grow up, to be
a person in the Great World, where
man
would be as safe to know as dogs ... .
Grateful from Eva-Mary by Linda McCarriston
There
are 59 million children in America. Of these, there are 3,200 to
4,600 abducted by strangers each year. Less than one percent of
this number are killed or held captive indefinitely by the kidnapper.
In 1998, the first year in which these kinds of records were kept,
there were 115 FBI investigations of stereotypical abductions
of children by strangers. In 2001, there were 98 FBI investigations
of such abductions. There is, then, a decline in this type of crime.
Or so I learned on CNN.com/LAWCENTER. At the web site for The National
Center for Missing and Exploited Children, I also learned that now
about 100 children a year, on average, are abducted by strangers
and never returned to their parents, as opposed to 200 or 300 annually
in the 1980s. As a parent, I went to these sites because I was in
search of comforting statistics, of hard facts that could take the
place of my irrational fears about sexual predators who kidnap children.
Unfortunately, the facts I found were of no real comfort, simply
because they cannot take the place of the faces of this summers
missing, abused, and murdered children who have been in newspaper
photographs, on magazine covers, and on television news.
Recently, the media has been awash with pictures of these children:
first Danielle van Dam, then Elizabeth Smart, then Samantha Runion,
then the miraculous child who escaped, Erica Pratt, and, most recently,
Cassandra Williamson, not to mention the less publicized Laura Ayala,
Jahi Turner, and Alexis Patterson. With the obsessive media coverage
of each new development, every parent I know has experienced a heightened
sense of anxiety, sometimes akin to panic. My friends who are mothers
have remembered guiltily every instance they have ever let their
children out of sight in a public place. Suddenly, for all of us,
the unthinkable lurks just around the corner. And because of the
circumstances of several of the cases, when we awaken at 2:30 a.m.
to check our children in their beds, the unthinkable has even entered
our homes. In those hours, with subconscious fears at the fore,
it is difficult to think rationally, and the statistics we call
to mind do not help. So we lie awake and listen, and think, and
maybe once more look in on dreaming children. Then later, even in
the light of early morning, when the same friends and I run or bike
together, the conversation often turns to the same frightening topic.
We continue to seek comfort, either through reassurances concerning
the general safety of where we live, or by an imagined meting out
of punishments, swift and without compassion, to the perpetrators
of crimes against children.
Finally, after we have done violence to the violent, we become calm
enough to talk about the fine line that exists between having a
street smart child and an unnecessarily frightened child.
This naturally leads us to the painful fact that at least one of
the children who was abducted, molested, and killed did everything
right — she said no, she screamed, she fought. And she died
anyway. This is what is most unbearable, because it dredges up the
worst of our fears — that no matter how hard we try, we cannot
control the world we and our children must inhabit.
When I started writing this article a few days ago, I did so while
my own child and her visiting cousins, all 10 and under, were upstairs
watching the video Tomb Raider. What our children watch at home
is something that parents can control, though some are more vigilant
than others in doing so. On this particular day, I was of the less-than-vigilant
variety, having never seen the film myself. I was, irresponsibly,
not even in the same part of the house from whence issued the techno
music that undoubtedly accompanied daring kicks and bosom-jiggling
leaps. I knew that the film was not entirely appropriate, though
I justified it by telling myself it was part of the new genre of
gorgeous-women-kicking-butt-while still-looking-gorgeous films,
hence mildly feminist, at least if one stretches things and admits
a fondness for the defunct Spice Girls brand of grrrrliness.
We dont even have television, per se, at our house, just a
small television/video player that we take out of the closet for
video viewing. Although Im smug about 20 years without television,
and I feel that its absence has had a positive effect on my daughters
view of the world, I have to admit that our substitute version has
been out of the closet a lot lately, with the amount of time it
spends out in direct correlation to the number of children in the
house at any given moment this summer. I usually like to think of
myself as a conscientious and deliberating parent, and I havent,
as a rule, let my child watch even mildly questionable movies unless
Im at least there to discuss them with her. But all of the
children had begged for this movie in the video store, and its
rating wasnt entirely prohibitive. However, I have to say
that the real bottom line was my own desire for an afternoon spent
with my writing. And I did manage to write a few paragraphs, feeling
only like a mildly bad mother, until one of the children did a practice
kick on his sister, (undoubtedly inspired by Tomb Raider Babe),
thus disrupting the movie and sending all of the children downstairs
to me insisting that I make good on my promise to take them swimming.
Because I really do hold childrens trust as a high priority,
and because I am about as guilt ridden as they come, I left my writing,
gathered towels and sunblock, loaded my car with swimsuit clad children
and their paraphernalia, and drove to the busy local swimming pool,
a world safer and more appealing to them, in fact, than the one
they had watched in the movie.
The world I inhabited as a child became less safe and appealing
during my thirteenth summer. The day before my fourteenth birthday,
on a plastic raft a few hundred yards out in the Atlantic Ocean,
a distant relative, an adult in his 40s, made inappropriate sexual
advances towards me. Because I couldnt swim, I also couldnt
remove myself from the situation. Having had no access to swimming
pools, and with the branch of water near my home only a few inches
deep, I had never learned. The experience, though frightening, disturbing,
and unforgivable, could have been much worse. I was spared further
violation by a combination of the relatives wife watching
us from a distance on shore, and by my own repeated and fervent
no. Because I was lucky, and because my fear, shock, and repulsion
must have been more than evident in the bright July sun, I was returned
to the shore intact, in most every sense of the word, although I
was terribly confused. Looking back, I can see that when I stepped
onto the beach that day, I did so having learned a difficult lesson
about whom I could trust. (And certainly, this question of trust
is shared by a number of people who have had similar or even worse
experiences, as everyone knows, if for no other reason, then from
the many accusations made against priests and given great publicity
in the last year.)
My parents trusted this man who made sexual overtures towards me,
a girl still prepubescent, never suspecting that he was a pedophile,
just as I trusted adults up until that time, and as all children
trust adults unless they are taught not to do so. My parents had
allowed me to go on a beach vacation with this relative as a treat
for me, a child for whom the beach was a novelty. I was to help
my relative and his wife by babysitting their children. They were
to help me by broadening my view of the world, if only a bit. He
kept his end of the bargain, because he did show me a world I knew
little about, but it wasnt at all what my parents had in mind.
Generally speaking, parents do trust people they feel they know,
and it is the stranger and predator they read about in the newspaper
who sends them into panic mode concerning their childrens
safety. But again, statistics offer no comfort concerning the people
we think we know. In a study done as early as the 1950s, when people
were far more reluctant to discuss sexual issues than they are today,
25 percent of female respondents reported being molested as children.
In half of the cases, the molester was someone they knew. In an
ongoing YWCA Rape Crisis Center study, 25 percent of females and
14 percent of males reported having been abused before their eighteenth
birthdays. Eighty percent of the victims knew their molester. And
I would say these statistics are about right, based on the women
I know and conversations we have had. Men find it far more difficult
to admit having been abused as children, and the reasons are obvious.
However, none of this is encouraging news. The only gleam of hope
I can find is that, in all but 20 percent of the recorded findings,
the sexual abuse was a one time occurrence, as in my own experience.
This is, I know, a dubious kind of hope, but repeated abuse is far
more damaging to the victim, and it results in pathologies much
worse than my own difficult and embarrassing memories.
Every parent worthy of the name wants to see children grow up in
a safe world, with good experiences that create healthy memories.
However, while we can control most of what children see and do in
our own homes, we cannot control all of the damaging and even deadly
manifestations of a society that is consumed with youth and sex.
We can only teach our children what is appropriate and inappropriate
touch, and that, while most adults are good, not all are worthy
of trust. For most children, this kind of information is enough
to keep them safe. Although records show that an average of 114,600
stranger abductions are attempted each year, only 4 percent are
successful, indicating that someone, either the parents or the child,
is doing something right. And while the numbers alone strike terror
in parents, they also tell us that we can and should teach our children
to protect themselves, that what we teach does have a strong effect.
We can teach them to run or fight, if necessary, but we should also
teach them that chances are good they will never need to do so.
We can teach them to make their way through life with anticipation,
instead of anxiety, with assurance, instead of fear. And, yes, we
can teach them to swim, and take them often to places where they
can practice in safety, watching with pleasure the pure beauty of
children moving through a different element, trusting, hoping that
their acquired skills will always keep them afloat.
(Dawn Gilchrist-Young is a public school teacher who lives in
Cullowhee.)
|
|