The story’s been floating around in the blogosphere for a
month or so and is now making it’s way to birding listservs.
Rumor has it that there will be an ivory-billed announcement at
the Oct. 3-7 meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union
in Veracruz, Mexico.
According to the rumor mill, Auburn University graduate student(s?)
have found one or more — up to 9 — pairs of ivory-billed
woodpeckers along the Choctawhatchee River in Florida’s panhandle.
And, of course, the sightings occurred perhaps a year or so ago
but have been kept under wraps to aid in land acquisition projects
— anyone get a sense of déja vu reading that?
And in the realm of coincidences, the sighting(s?) occurred on
public lands adjacent a highly environmentally questionable mega
development — a proposed airport. Of course, no one would
think of filing suit to stop such a project on behalf of a yet-to-be,
irrefutably substantiated endangered species, like, say an ivory-billed
woodpecker. Oh, wait — that has been done.
I know statements like those above will likely get me listed on
some blogs as one of those spouse-beating, puppy-kicking, anti-environmental,
anti-conservation, anti-preservation, pro-development, ne’re-do-wells
— but tain’t so. As populations increase and the desire
for acquiring wealth increases and natural resources dwindle, the
challenge to protect those resources and preserve wild and scenic
landscapes as well as environmentally and ecologically sensitive
ecosystems is going to increase exponentially. The energy, diligence
and commitment that will be required from my children and their
children to protect those natural resources and preserve the ever-shrinking
wild landscape will also rise exponentially. We don’t need
to saddle them with ready-made epithets like “those environmental-whackos
that wanted to save that extinct woodpecker.”
When Cornell Lab of Ornithology announced, in 2005, the re-discovery
of the ivory-billed woodpecker I, like most birders, was initially
thrilled. As I began to review the evidence, I became skeptical.
As time passed — it’s been almost three years since
that kayaker deep in the impenetrable Arkansas swamp allegedly saw
the grail bird — I became more skeptical. Now I am cynically
skeptical of CLO’s evidence and their modus operandi.
Because of column space limitations I will list only one of CLO’s
glaring faux pauxs. In response to David Sibley et al’s paper
in Science questioning CLO’s interpretation of the four-second,
Bigfoot-quality video, used to substantiate the existence of an
ivory-billed woodpecker in Arkansas, Fitzpatrick (of CLO) et al
stated, “After studying the evidence at length, the Bird Records
Committee of the Arkansas Audubon Society voted unanimously to accept
the documentation of ivory-billed woodpecker.”
The actual vote was 4-1 with Mike Mlodinow objecting. What was
Mlodinow’s response to the video? “You can barely tell
it’s a bird.”
The statement was, at best, a simple proofing error. At worst,
it was a deliberate attempt to mislead.
If this has become some kind of academic ivory-billed one-upmanship
then I guess nine pair beats one-of-a-kind. The next great institute
of higher learning will have to wait for a flock of ivory-billeds.
Stay tuned.
Auburn University had a website up Monday, Sept. 25, but quickly
pulled it. They are supposed to be back up by the time this issue
comes out. Quite extraordinary claims, but no photos.