The vote was unanimous to put the new courthouse downtown on property
owned by the county. Among those who agreed were Mary Ann Enloe, Jim
Stevens, Bill Noland and Jack Stevens.
That vote, however, was on March 1, 1999, and it was made by the often-referred
to Haywood County Court Facilities Task Force. That and
other discussions from the very earliest meetings about the now controversial
justice center project are contained in the minutes from those meetings.
This task force pre-dated the Howard Geisler needs study analysis and
the hiring of architects.
Committee members (listed below) included county and court officials
and five at-large citizens. Noland, now a county commissioner,
was on the task force as a representative of the juvenile justice area.
As time passed and we studied the issue, we determined that downtown
was the best avenue to go, said Larry Ammons, a banking executive
and a member of that task force who was interviewed last week.
Ammons said he remembered the main purpose of that task force was to
make a recommendation about siting the new justice center.
It was not a given then that it would be downtown, but that was
where we were when we finished, said Ammons, who was one of the
five task force members not involved in county government or the court
system.
He realizes that discussions about moving from downtown became more
relevant when cost became a factor. However, he still feels that downtown
site would be best.
If Haywood County wants to lead in this area, you have to do things
that are visionary. If you want a center of government that speaks of
leadership and good government, the best place to be is in the downtown
area, said Ammons.
Canton mayor and attorney Pat Smathers was also on that early task force.
He, in fact, made the motion to keep the new facility downtown and adjacent
to the existing courthouse.
That was certainly my understanding, that it would be at the downtown
site, said Smathers.
As he remembers it, Smathers said that committee was primarily focused
on siting the proposed center. It was also charged with determining
if there was a need for one, but that decision was made early on in
the process.
I was one of the more vocal advocates for the downtown site,
said Smathers. I felt we could still make a lot of use of the
existing courthouse.
The vote earlier this month to move the new justice center to Hazelwood
came as a surprise to Smathers.
I would still like to see the existing courthouse used as a Superior
Courtroom, and my first preference would be on the current site —
somehow, some way, he said.
A third at-large member of that early task force was Artis Lee, a Waynesville
resident. She too said it was the early consensus of the task force
to stay on Main Street.
Nothing was finalized, but I do know that at the beginning we
were all in agreement to stay downtown, said Lee. Since
then a lot has happened.
Although those early meetings did not specifically discuss costs, the
minutes reveal that there was information disseminated by county Finance
Officer Donna Clark on what kinds of financing were available to the
county. In addition to general obligation bonds (which require voter
approval) and certificate of participation bonds, she also told the
committee about lease-purchase financing. That option is only available
for projects which cost less than $10 million.
Members of the Court Facilities Task Force included County Manager Jack
Horton, Commissioners Mary Ann Enloe and Jim Stevens, Finance Director
Donna Clark (who now works in Buncombe County), County attorney Chip
Killian, Judges Marlene Hyatt and Danny Davis, attorney Pat Smathers,
Clerk of Court Gil Henry, Tax Collector David Francis, Juvenile Justice
employee Bill Noland (now a county commissioner), Probation officer
Olin Finger, Sheriff Tom Alexander, District Attorney Charles Hipps,
Register of Deeds Amy Murray and citizen members Larry Ammons (Waynesville),
Pat Greely (Canton), Troy Mann (Canton), Artis Lee (Waynesville) and
Barbara Sue Parker (Clyde).