| |
<< Back
10/23/02
Voting
remains a neglected civic duty
American politicos keep trying
to get citizens to the polls
By
John Estes and Scott McLeod
The Rev.
Robert Cooper of Haywood County is an informed, civic-minded citizen
who even heads up a county group known as GO-Vote. It works hard each
election to organize forums so voters can make informed decisions.
Still, he admits that a couple of years ago he forgot to vote.
I fully intended to vote. But in the busy-ness of the day, my
time got used up, Cooper said.
Voter turnout is one of the pesky issues in American politics that
surface every election. In a typical election year, a small minority
of those eligible to vote decide who will hold office. In the October
primary in Haywood County, only 23 percent of registered voters turned
out. In the 1998 general election, when there was no presidential
race, 44 percent of registered voters turned out. Election officials
expect a similar turnout this year despite stepped up efforts to register
voters and make it easier for them to cast their ballots.
Americans somehow dont see the irony in watching voters in some
Third World country stand in line for hours and endure physical intimidation
and other hardships to cast ballots while ranting about the U.S. being
the greatest of all democracies.
Why vote?
What it ultimately comes down to is, the benefits of voting
just dont outweigh the costs of doing so, says political
science professor Dr. William Sabo of UNC-Asheville.
He points to the time spent getting registered in the first place
and then actually going to the polls. Programs like the Motor Voter
law — which lets people register to vote when getting their
drivers license renewed — and No Excuses Voting — which
allows voting from now until Nov. 2 in all board of elections offices
—were designed to combat these time constraints that potential
voters find themselves in.
The real pressure, though, is that voters are supposed to
cast a wise vote, said Sabo.
The difficulty in finding out where candidates stand on increasingly
complex issues so that one can make an informed decision takes a
good deal of time and effort, said Sabo.
And political parties — which used to spend loads of time
and money registering voters and making sure they knew who to vote
for and when to vote — have changed their focus. Sweeping
campaign reforms reduced the political spoils system and thereby
reduced the incentive of the parties, according to Sabo
The parties had incentive to win, and pulled out all stops
to get people to the polls, he said. Their incentives
were removed by reforms.
As the parties were encouraged to take a more straight and narrow
path, they had to appeal to a wider audience. Party lines got more
blurred. Candidates came along who didnt fit a partys
strict political platform. Increasingly, elections have become less
a campaign of the party and more so of the individual. Straight-ticket
voters are rare.
Those vague party lines are exactly what gives us such a low voter
turnout compared to the rest of the world, said Dr. Gibbs Knotts
of Western Carolina University. Countries in Europe have more
parties, because even a small portion of the total vote gets representation,
says Knotts.
A two-party limit
Not so in our two-party system, where plurality rules. If candidates
dont win more votes than their competition, then they dont
win anything. In Germany, though, any party receiving over 10 percent
of the vote gets some type of representation. Then the ruling party
must work with the smaller parties to form a coalition that can
push bills through, thus empowering the smaller party.
Not only does the two-party system stifle choice, it limits the
competition. Third parties have almost no chance in this system,
says Sabo. He points to the inroads made by Libertarians, the Green
Party and Ross Perots Reform Party. Their success, though,
only earned scorn from Democratic and Republican candidates because
it eroded part of their power base. There was no incentive to invite
those parties in.
Sabo, though, said our Constitution was set up with a two-party
system in mind.
Rules in the Constitution itself guarantee a centrist two-party
system. If they didnt intend for it to be this way, then Id
have to say they were pretty ignorant of what they were doing,
said Sabo.
According to Sabo, another institution has to come forward now to
make people care enough to vote again. There has been a rise in
special-interest groups who do their own part for voter turnout,
but their incentive is only directed towards their own candidates.
Experts say groups like the National Organization of Women and the
National Rifle Association encourage people to vote based on a narrow
range of issues.
Other than that, all we can do is make it easier and less time-consuming,
says Knotts. It is still too early to gauge the effectiveness of
No Excuse Voting and Motor Voter laws, he said.
You could do it online or by mail, but then with such mechanisms
you run an increasing risk of voter fraud, said Knotts.
O.L. Yeats is the head of the Haywood County Board of Elections
and a high school teacher. He thinks educating young people about
elections and getting them interested is one way to combat low voter
turnout.
Its just not pushed in the schools, he said.
Yeats has high hopes for the No Excuse Voting, which opened Oct.
17 and lasts until Nov. 2 at 1 p.m.
There is just no one who can truthfully say they were too
busy 24 hours a day for three weeks, said Yeats.
|
|