Ive got shocking news for Americans. Soft money campaign contributions
are legal bribery.
Ho hum.
Arizona Sen. John McCain already finds himself swimming upstream as
he begins pushing his pet project against the power of the paranoid
party. Campaign Finance Reform is a term heard so often,
that it sounds like the birds chirping in the background on a bright
Sunday morning. Its nice, but whos paying attention?
There is nothing good about legal bribery, and everything bad. It means
the ones with the most, who give the most, get the most from Uncle Sam.
Its that simple. And, for the politician, he not only has to maintain
a check list of his debts to contributors, he must continually run for
office, raising money so he or she can get re-elected, so they can keep
raising more money.
Thats their job.
No offense to congressman Charles Taylor or any of his colleagues in
the U.S. House of Representatives, but I have often wondered about voters
getting the biggest bang for the buck. Why arent we appalled that
members of Congress must spend half of their two-year terms running
for re-election, pandering for big bucks from major contributors, attending
fund raiser after fund raiser doing everything they can to stay in office.
Everything, that is, but dedicating their time and energy to the peoples
commission.
Its the system. They didnt invent it, they just abide by
it.
Can the system be changed? Sure it can.
Whos going to do it? Aye, theres the rub. Well just
leave it to ... (ahem)... the politicians.
The Republican Party sure breathed a sigh of relief when Sen. McCain
failed in his bid for the presidential nomination, mainly because the
former Vietnam POW had mustered an unexpected swell of support for his
reform initiative. He scared the oil out of candidate George W. Bush
and the big party machine because these contributions from corporate
giants and special interest groups are the pillars upon which any party
thrives. If Dupont or the NRA send Bush or Gore, or any senator, congressman
or governor, fifty thousand dollars into their war chest, thats
remembered at legislation time. When its time to decide between
an NRA problem, or a rehabilitation center, you know who gets the nod.
Do we care? Apparently not.
Seems to me, when my colleagues on the police department accepted money
for favors, they were either fired or locked up.
When this nation was founded in the late 1700s, the entire population
was less than todays state of South Carolina. Towns were small.
Groveling for dough was not on their agenda because most townspeople
personally knew their elected representatives. That included judges,
aldermen, mayors and even senators. When comparing todays politics
to those of yore, we often hear reverent references to the integrity
of our founding fathers. Comparing then to now is like comparing the
Conestoga to the Concorde. Jefferson, Franklin and Madison didnt
have to grovel for contributions and owe their soul to anyone but the
will of the people.
No more. The only way average Americans can meet their representatives
today is a perfunctory handshake at campaign time or by coughing up
donations. Otherwise, its billboards, name recognition, sound
bytes and platform rhetoric.
The general public professes to be appalled at any hint of immorality,
including an individuals sexual transgressions which affects no
one except personal family. Yet, taking money for favors isnt
considered among the mortal sins of political life because, well, its
legal. Watch closely. We all know, down deep in our hearts, that newly
elected President, George W. Bush owes dearly. It was his key to the
White House. When the time is right, those debts will be satisfied,
be it abortion, religious issues, gun control, taxes, environment and
much more. It has to do with payback, and nothing to do with personal
beliefs.
Americans are notorious for supporting corrupt officials so long as
they have clout and charisma. The rest doesnt matter.
Several years back, the great city of Washington, D.C., thought nothing
of reinstating Marion Barry as mayor despite being nabbed on video using
crack cocaine with a female consort. The highest official of that city
was voted back in charge of the very cops sworn to enforce the laws
he broke. Had a cop been caught doing the same, he would not only lost
his job, hed have been sent away for half his lifetime.
Double standard?
Alcee Hastings was a federal judge in Florida who got caught in an alleged
bribery scam. Though he was ultimately acquitted in a trial in which
his cohort wouldnt testify against him, it was later discovered
that he had committed perjury in his own behalf. He was impeached by
the Congress and then convicted by the U.S. Senate by a vote of 100-0,
banished from the bench. No doubts there, apparently.
Did it affect voters? Think again. Hastings subsequently ran for a seat
in the U.S. House in one of those convoluted ink-blot districts designed
to garner the black voting block, and ... get this ... he won! Talk
about chutzpa. Now he is a member of the very Congress that impeached
him, thanks to an electorate that didnt give a damn.
My former home town of Miami has been scathed by one political scandal
after another exposing an array of crooked politicians, yet the people
continue to vote them in.
It boggles the mind.
Legal or not, it still paints the same grim picture that money is the
root of all corruption. One way to change and support the democratic
system is to get behind Sen. McCain and his bi-partisan constituency
in their efforts to do away with soft money. Then, to keep our system
honest, taxpayers can finance campaigns of major candidates by pitching
in an extra 5 or 10 bucks on their income tax returns. It will make
a lot of politicians unhappy, but the American voter would finally supercede
corporate giants and special interest groups in the gimme line.
Its one way of getting sanctioned bribery out of the picture.
That is, if we really care.
(Marshall Franks book, Beyond the Call, is available at area
bookstores. He can be reached at mlf283@aol.com)