I am 27 years old, young still by most accounts, though when Im
standing in front of my students at Western Carolina University, the
chasm between myself and them seems like an unfathomable
canyon - so deep and wide I cannot see to the bottom or the other side.
On the surface, the difference seems obvious. At work, I dress like
a professional, at least in the collegiate sense of the word. I shave
my legs. A lot of my clothes are from the Gap and Banana Republic. My
hair is brushed, and, on good days, I wear lip gloss and perfume. My
costume designer for my role as the young college professor did a great
job.
Likewise, my students seem to do their best to fit their parts as well.
I mean, college students, unless theyre going to a school that
costs more per semester than my house, arent supposed to look
professional. They are supposed to look comfortable, even slack, in
the Im-so-busy-studying/partying-I-dont-care-what-I-wear
kind of way. Add to this the need, the inherent necessity, of looking
like their favorite actors and musicians - the way their parents wouldnt
let them look in high school - and you have my typical class, staring
at me from behind their uncomfortable desk-chairs and defining the look
of the new decade even if they dont know it.
What I see is shocking, even though I am only eight or nine years their
senior. Instead of the sound of crackling bubble gum or crumpling paper
that I thought I would hear as a teacher, I hear instead the sound of
a dozen or so tongue piercings, which the students like to knock annoyingly
against their front teeth. Click. Click. Click. Other piercings
are standard fare as well - eyebrows, belly buttons, noses, as well
as regions only bragged about in class. Last semester I let a student
do a paper on body piercings, and when she signed up for the second
part of my writing class this semester, she immediately told me that
as a result of her paper she had her belly button pierced again. O-kaaaaaaaay.
Not exactly what I expected students to get from my class, but what
the hell.
Tattoos also mark close to half the students in my classes. My female
students often happily show me their recent acquisitions on their ankles,
shoulders, and, most popularly, on the smalls of their backs. Usually,
their proud displays are followed by a fierce whisper loud enough for
the class to hear, My Mother would KILL me if she knew!
Guys tend to go for the arm region and select as their material an odd
array from Disney cartoon characters to Celtic art, though the strong
winner for the men is the Greek letters of their fraternities.
My biggest surprise concerning students self-expression came a
year or so ago when one of my best writers, a fairly strait-laced guy
who had aspirations to become a FBI agent, appeared in class at the
end of his fraternity initiation with the letters for his frat branded
onto his bicep. I know my mouth dropped open when he pulled up his sleeve.
I nodded with concerned attentiveness as he told me how it didnt
really hurt and how he was putting Neosporin on it, but I couldnt
stop myself from letting out a slow moo.
I dont mean for this to sound like one of those articles that
laments the degeneration of American youth. Neither do I want this to
come across as a somewhat bewildered and bemused profile of those
crazy kids. When I was 20, I pierced my nose. I explored the murkiest
depths of the socially rebellious underworld with a fervor befitting
a young woman from a Southern Baptist, small town upbringing. I teased
my hair into a B-52 beehive and raved with the best of them. I was one
of the tragically hip, who used freak-style fashion to make a statement.
Instead, I think my sense of confusion - my sense of feeling old - comes
not so much from the way my students look, but the way my students think.
When I was still in college, looking like a freak meant something. Generally
speaking, people with body piercings and tattoos were outside of the
box. To me these were outside symbols of an inward state of, shall I
say, grace. Yes, they did in a sense brand you as one of the herd, but
it was the outcast herd, the alternative to the mainstream
cattle drive. But the people I knew in college who rejected standard
dress also rejected the status quo; they were social reformers, even
anarchists. At some point in the 90s, this alternative style became
the standard way for young people to look, though the philosophical
implications didnt come as part of the package.
In fact, despite the overall radical appearance of my students, the
majority is at heart quite conservative. Most of them voted for Bush.
Many have we still pray stickers on their cars. While they
endorse body art, the idea of a womans hairy armpits is revolting
to them. Furthermore, according to their argumentative research papers,
most support traditional right-wing stances on topics such as abortion,
gun control, welfare, and the Confederate flag. Though they certainly
dont look like it, many could have worked on the campaign for
Pat Bucannan.
I tell myself this is the expected backlash against the Clinton administration
and that, since young people have to rebel against their environment,
they are striking out against the popular liberal agenda of the 90s.
Perhaps, to them, Bush represents a different way of thinking and appears
as an alternative. Maybe my generation went so far left that young people
now are coming in from the right.
Sometimes I feel like Im living in a parallel universe, like a
mirror world from an old science fiction film. Everything looks a bit
backward and its confusing. My friends from college and I have
retired our nose rings and downplay other identifiers that mark us as
radicals. But we are. Since looking like a freak no longer means thinking
like a freak, maybe well have to come up with a secret handshake
or peculiar whistle. I ask my students to ponder this question of fashion
and philosophy, and I can hear their brains working. Click. Click. Click.
(Esther Godfrey teaches English at WCU in Cullowhee. She can be reached
at egodfrey@wcu.edu)