There is a consensus to preserve the Needmore Tract in its current
use, a government official working with various groups and agencies
told a small group of area residents last week.
Bill Gibson told the group that during his tenure with Southwestern
Commission he had been a party to numerous ventures, including the merger
between Duke and NP&L. He said he had never been involved with a project
that had the consensus of opinion that preserving Needmore has. He said
he had been to Raleigh last week and heard lots of support for Needmore
from the western legislators there.
I dont know where its going to end up, but I have
a positive sense the final solution will be compatible with the interests
you shared here, Gibson told the group of stakeholders representing
Mountain Neighbors for Needmore Preservation at an April 12 meeting.
Cheryl Taylor, who organized the group, said she felt a bit more optimistic
about the future of Needmore after the meeting.
Needmore is a 4,500-acre tract along the Little Tennessee River in Macon
and Swain counties. Most of the land, approximately 3,400 acres, is
in Swain County. In December 1999, after Nantahala Power & Light was
acquired by Duke Energy the tract was transferred to Crescent Resources,
the land management arm of Duke. Crescent partnered with the North Carolina
Chapter of The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and in February 2000 began what
they estimated would be a two-year process to determine the fate of
the property.
The Needmore tract and the section of Little Tennessee that runs through
it are renowned for their biodiversity and revered for their natural
beauty and recreational opportunities. Although originally acquired
in the 1930s for hydroelectric production, the river was never dammed
and for the last half century Needmore has been a mosaic of leased pasture,
farmlands, and wooded river and mountainsides with nearly unlimited
public access.
Fears that Crescent would develop large areas of the tract spurred many
people to action. Macon County commissioners signed a resolution in
March 2000, stating their desire to see established land use of the
Needmore Tract preserved and continued.
Taylor, through letters to the editor, phone calls and word of mouth,
created Mountain Neighbors for Needmore Preservation, a group of leaseholders,
adjacent property owners and other interested stakeholders seeking to
preserve the character of Needmore.
Recently Swain County commissioners passed a resolution seeking to preserve
the current multiple land-use pattern in Needmore. Swain County took
it a step further and enlisted Gibson to work on behalf of the county
to accomplish the goals set forth in the resolution. Macon County followed
suit and empowered Gibson to work on its behalf concerning Needmore,
as well.
Gibson told the group at Thursdays meeting the counties have told
me to do whatever it takes, in their interest, to keep current uses.
When asked, Gibson said that he didnt feel money would be the
issue.
The issue will be having Crescent and Duke come to a determination
consistent with the desires of the public and local governments at a
price that is affordable, said Gibson.
He said he felt the money could be put together when Duke puts
a price on this. He said the money would most likely come from
grants and there would be no repayment.
Paul Carlson, director of The Land Trust for the Little Tennessee (TLT),
agreed. The counties should not carry the burden of profit Duke-Crescent
makes, said Carlson.
TLT is a not for profit organization that is dedicated to protecting
and enhancing the integrity of the Little Tennessee River.
There is nothing like that river, said Carlson.
He feels that funding will be made available for the protection of the
water in Needmore. He noted that there were 27 miles of river and 37
miles of tributaries on the tract.
Gibson said TNC was quite aware of the biological value of the property.
According to Gibson, Este Stifel of TNC felt it was a no brainer
to TNC that the property should be conserved.
Gibson and Carlson identified the North Carolina Clean Water Management
Trust Fund, the Heritage Trust and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission as likely sources for funding.
Crescents latest timeline for Needmore calls for continued meetings
with stakeholders during spring 2001; reviewing existing research and
determining the need for future studies, summer 2001; assemble data
and draft initial findings, fall 2001; review findings and invite additional
input, winter 2002; and produce a tentative report, spring 2002.
Stifle said that Crescent had people on the property for the first time
last week to assess it from a development perspective.
It was a step forward. We need these assessments to see where
were headed, Stifel said.
Gibson met with Stifel and Crescent project manager Scott Munday before
the Needmore meeting. He said he got a sense that Crescent might wind
up its process by the end of this year.
When asked about tying Needmore to Dukes hydroelectric relicensing
efforts as mitigation, Gibson told the group, mitigation is not
in our best interest at this time.
Relicensing is going to be a long and drawn out process and we
dont want to extend the time frame with regards to Needmore,
he said.
In a recent conversation, Chris McGrath, non-game project leader for
state Wildlife Resources Commission, said with both Swain and Macon
counties supporting the preservation of Needmore, the wildlife commission
has enthusiastically joined the discussion. Gibson has spoken over the
phone with Joffrey Brooks of the NCWRC and confirmed there is a definite
interest in the tract.