Hydropower relicensing may be a bureaucratic boondoggle of colossal
proportions, but one local group has launched itself into this regulatory
wasteland and committed itself to going the distance.
The Tuckasegee River Cooperative Stakeholder Team met earlier this month
at the Duke Power/Nantahala Area offices in Franklin. The group has
been in place for about a year. It is a project of the National Resources
Leadership Initiative (NRLI), a joint venture of North Carolina State
University and the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. The
team is facilitated by Steve Reed, planner for the N.C. Division of
Water Quality; Don Rayno, planner for the N.C. Division of Water Resources;
and Michelle Suverkrubbe, the planner for the town of Cary.
The mission of the Tuckasegee team is to identify issues and interests
related to the East Fork, West Fork, and Dillsboro hydroelectric projects
which include seven reservoirs and six powerhouses located in the Tuckasegee
River basin of Western North Carolina. The team plans to create a set
of consensus recommendations for the relicensing of these projects.
The Tuckasegee team plans to have this accomplished by Feb. 1, 2003.
Duke plans to have its relicensing application for Dillsboro submitted
to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) by mid 2003 and applications
for East Fork and West Fork by mid 2004.
The Tuckasegee Stakeholders Team represents a diverse group of individuals
and entities with converging and conflicting interests regarding the
outcome of the relicensing. Members of the team include representatives
from local government, the U.S. Forest Service, Trout Unlimited, N.C.
Wildlife Resources, the Western North Carolina Alliance, private boaters,
Friends of Lake Glenville, Duke Power, various business interests and
concerned individuals. While not proposed as a formal part of the FERC
relicensing program, the Tuckasegee Stakeholders Team is supported by
Duke Power/Nanatahala Area. In a previous stakeholders meeting, Ron
McKittrick of FERC told team members that issues they could build consensus
on would help expedite relicensing and would likely be a part of the
final licensing agreement.
After a painstaking year of defining and organizing issues to be addressed,
data is beginning to come in. Jennifer Huff of Duke Power and archaeologist
Deborah Joy of Legacy Research Associates presented a report on phase
I of Dukes archaeological survey. The study found no significant
archaeological sites along East Fork, including the shorelines of Bear
Creek and Wolf Creek reservoirs. Phase I of the West Fork is scheduled
for December of this year.
Jason Walls, a team member and economic development director for Swain
County, told the group that he and others were working on a study of
the economic impact of tourism generated by the Tuckasegee and Nantahala
rivers in Swain and Jackson counties. Walls said it is important that
FERC understands the economic impact these rivers have on the region.
The report will be presented at the next stakeholders meeting.
A recreational instream flow study along the Tuckasegee will be conducted
on July 2 and 3. The project, coordinated by Bunny Johns, will compare
recreational experiences provided by different flow levels. Paddlers
in rafts, duckys, kayaks, and canoes will experience two releases each
day and evaluate each one. Johns is still seeking volunteers, especially
canoeists, to participate in the study. Participants must commit to
both days. To volunteer contact Johns at 828.488.8539.
While the first year was tedious, team members hope a template has been
put in place which will allow them to analyze data that will be pouring
in. Duke has over 30 studies designed to guide the relicensing project.
Final reports from all these studies are expected between December 2001
and November 2002.
Although facilitators Reed, Rayno, and Suverkrubbe have finished their
one-year practicum, NRLI directors are committed to supporting and facilitating
the Tuckasegee Stakeholders Team through the February 2003 date spelled
out in their charter. As for team members, responses on NRLIs
facilitator/meeting evaluation leave no doubt that most are committed
to being a part of the relicensing process.