I went to the Internet one day last week surfing for news, and I came away
thinking about what it means to raise a son in this day and age.
I found a letter to the editor on the website of some small Florida
newspaper. Im sure it was from a father, a man wondering about
the future of young American males. As the father of a young man just
one week shy of 3 years old, my interest was piqued.
Heres one paragraph: A fourth-grader at Bunnell Elementary
School received a 10-day suspension for drawing a picture of himself
shooting another pupil with a laser gun.
The letter ended with this:
Where there is no room for boys, there will be no great men coming
up any time soon, unless those rebels who are homeschooling
or teaching their boys otherwise and keeping them out of the clutches
of the gender-neutral police produce a few.
I have no information on the author, but his point was well taken. Our
son is in that stage of guns, spears and swords. That guy in Florida
is right - there is no clearcut dividing line between the normal play
antics of boys and what may later be deemed potentially violent inclinations.
But that guy was wearing blinders or something, because he only discussed
half of the issue. It isnt the gender-neutral police
who somehow supplant aggression and try to bring out the gentler side
of boys.
That gentle part of wild young boys is as natural as the aggression.
In the old days, however, we nurtured that side away, building a society
that labeled sensitive, artistic men as wussies, rewarding only the
tough swagger that was most often just a put on. Nowadays, as the letter
writer noted, a huge chunk of society is nurturing the natural, aggressive
side into submission. The challenge is to find a middle ground.
Its easy to see those two seemingly different character traits
in young boys. I offer up my own young son as Exhibit A.
If there is such a thing, he might be called a happy hellion. Part of
his morning routine is to come barreling into our office, pick out whichever
co-worker seems a likely target and begin to shoot them, his arms taking
the form of a rifle and the sound effects adding to the display. Growls,
shots, space weapon sounds, rulers, sticks - whatever comes to his mind
or is nearby - are part of his display.
All of it, though, comes with a sly smile, part of the game he loves
to play. His two older sisters had their own games, perhaps a bit more
elaborately constructed with more character development, but never once
did they go through a stage where they loved to play shoot and sword
fight. Never.
And how about this: the only gun - real or plastic - in the house is
an oversized water rifle. There is a plastic sword with with a helmet
and shield. We dont own a single video game (though I suspect
it is only a matter of time). He has watched Toy Story and often becomes
Buzz Lightyear, but thats about the extent of the violence to
which hes been exposed. That tells me that part of his game is
as natural as his blond hair and big ears.
And, like some small children of both sexes, he hits when he gets ticked
off at someone. We are teaching him to use other ways of channeling
his temper, but his natural tendency often is just to strike out before
he has even thought about the consequences.
Did I mention he does all of this with painted toe nails. He loves to
let the girls dress him up - including doing his nails, wearing dresses,
and donning face paint - and he thinks it looks cool. He hasnt
yet been imprinted by societys code. He is, we like to think,
an independent thinker.
I dont know when young boys begin hiding their emotions, but perhaps
that is when the play acting morphs into the potential for real violence.
Our little guy certainly hasnt hit that stage, and I hope he never
does.
No, his idea of bliss is to curl up in a warm bed with mom early in
the morning, snuggling, hugging, talking, laughing and kissing. That
was also my favorite part of the day, so we engage in that typically
male ritual of trying to impress the female, fighting for moms
attention. Guess who usually wins.
That man from Florida had a point about letting boys be aggressive.
Perhaps in some ways we have become so preoccupied with youth violence
that we are not letting boys - or girls - show the wildness that is
only natural. But it also seems that part of the violence problem may
be the result of refusing to nurture in young men a more sensitive,
gentler side. Maybe the men of the new millennium can have it both ways,
like the little warrior with painted toenails.