At our inception 20 years ago, we chose to be different. Unlike other news organizations, we made the decision to provide in-depth, regional reporting free to anyone who wanted access to it. We don’t plan to change that model. Support from our readers will help us maintain and strengthen the editorial independence that is crucial to our mission to help make Western North Carolina a better place to call home. If you are able, please support The Smoky Mountain News.

The Smoky Mountain News is a wholly private corporation. Reader contributions support the journalistic mission of SMN to remain independent. Your support of SMN does not constitute a charitable donation. If you have a question about contributing to SMN, please contact us.

Canton continues pondering pigs as pets

Giggles, snickers, snorts and outright laughter echoed through the Town of Canton’s Sept. 28 board meeting as an ordinance regarding “pigs as pets” was again discussed.

The normally reserved, businesslike board first heard the proposal Sept. 12 and appeared to be generally in favor of allowing smaller breeds of pigs as pets within the town, but got bogged down over registration, licensing procedures and enforcement, weight limits and the number of pigs allowable in any one home.

When they discussed the issue again last week, some members of the crowd — and the board — just couldn’t hold back guffaws any longer, probably due to the rarity, novelty and adorability of these animals that are still most often associated with food.

In the past, animal control ordinances across the country considered pigs as livestock — because they were; the trend of keeping smaller breeds of pigs in one’s home as a pet is relatively recent.

But as popularity of the porcine pals continues to grow — the North American Pet Pig Association has only been around since 1989 — municipalities have had to address the issue and its ensuing consequences.

A draft ordinance presented by Town Manager Jason Burrell says that “any member of the dwarf breed of pig known as Vietnamese potbellied pigs (Susscrofa bittatus)” that was being housed as a pet “and not kept or raised for human consumption” would be allowable, provided that that no more than two pigs were kept in the same home, that they grow to no more than 22 inches in height and that they do not exceed 100 pounds in weight.

Other restrictions similar to those of dogs (becoming a nuisance, improper disposal of waste or leash requirements) would also apply.

Regarding a possible weight limit for the pigs, members of the board asked Burrell who would enforce it, and how.

“I’d have no problem weighing a pig,” said the burly Burrell.

Burrell presented the board with a wealth of information on how other towns handle the porky pets and said he’d also seen a weight limit of 65 pounds in some of them, but Alderman Zeb Smathers opened up another line of thinking when he noted that the town doesn’t register any other animals.

The meeting ended with no action being taken, but members of the town have long been receptive to public input; contact the Canton Town Board about pigs as pets at

Go to top