Archived Opinion

Gun safety legislation

Gun safety legislation

To the Editor:

As a mother, aunt, pediatrician and neighbor to beloved children, I have long been deeply troubled by the exorbitant levels of gun violence in our country, and my heart was sickened again last month by the massacre of children and teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. 

It is encouraging this week to see the new legislation this past week passed by Congress and signed by the president — the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act — aimed at reducing firearm deaths, which would give authorities up to 10 business days to review the juvenile and mental health records of gun permit applicants younger than 21; direct millions of dollars toward helping states implement red flag laws (which allow authorities to temporarily confiscate guns from people deemed by a judge to be dangerous); ensure that serious dating partners are included in the federal law that bars domestic abusers from purchasing firearms; provide millions of dollars for expanding mental health resources in communities and schools as well as boost funds for school safety; and toughen penalties for those evading licensing requirements or making “straw” purchases, buying and then selling weapons to people barred from purchasing handguns. It is a first step, achieved through the heroic leadership of Christopher Murphy, the Democratic senator from Connecticut. 

It is very encouraging to see a proposed gun safety legislation actually being supported by more than just one or two Republican senators for the first time in decades. For too long, the NRA with its manipulative message of fear and its powerful financial hold on Republicans, has held us all hostage. Already the NRA has condemned this bill and every senator who supports it, even though it does not hamper the right of any law-abiding, non-dangerous citizen from buying a gun. 

I myself am a Democrat, because as a pediatrician it has been abundantly clear to me over the years that it is the Democrat Party who has promoted policies that uphold the well-being of women, children and families. But I am grateful that our Republican Sen. Thom Tillis was willing to stick his neck out to work with Murphy on the team that hammered out the compromises required for the details of this legislation. If you are a Republican who has voted for Tillis in the past, and someone who cares about the safety of our children and communities, please let him know of your support for this legislation and of your appreciation for his willingness to work on it. He needs to hear support loud and clear from people like you. You can email him through his website, at www.tillis.senate.gov/ or call him at the Senate at 202.224.6342 or at his Charlotte office number, 704.509.9087. In the final Senate vote, both Tillis and N.C. Sen. Richard Burr voted for it, two of only 14 GOP senators who supported the measure.

It is tempting to think in despair that until we have campaign finance reform that prevents powerful lobbies like the NRA from influencing legislators through huge financial contributions, that our own voices don’t matter. In fact, if Tillis and other Republican senators learn that they can work on solutions to this problem and still be supported by Republican voters, they could escape the NRA’s stranglehold and finally begin to work with Democrats to prioritize the safety of our children. Please, speak up in support of our children’s safety. 

Joyce Hooley

Marshall

Leave a comment

7 comments

  • Notice the anti-gun commenters on this letter to the editor are among God's Chosen People. Sad.

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Monday, 07/04/2022

  • Thank you!

    posted by Deni Gottlieb

    Sunday, 07/03/2022

  • Why does anyone suppose Federal Gun Legislation would not or should not affect cities as well as small towns? and Dems as well as Repubs?
    There's a concept known as win-win, in which everyone benefits. If your mindset is "what's good for them must be bad for me", then you will always be in combative mode. This equals misery. Please at least consider that there are ways to make life better for everyone.
    When a liberal says "Save the Earth", do you immediately reply: "Destroy the Earth"? Didn't think so.

    posted by Mike Goodman

    Saturday, 07/02/2022

  • Why does anyone suppose Federal Gun Legislation would not or should not affect cities as well as small towns? and Dems as well as Repubs?
    There's a concept known as win-win, in which everyone benefits. If your mindset is "what's good for them must be bad for me", then you will always be in combative mode. This equals misery. Please at least consider that there are ways to make life better for everyone.
    When a liberal says "Save the Earth", do you immediately reply: "Destroy the Earth"? Didn't think so.

    posted by Mike Goodman

    Saturday, 07/02/2022

  • Criminals in any crime ridden Democrat run city do not respect any Federal Gun Legislation.

    posted by Lucille Josephs

    Saturday, 07/02/2022

  • These cities would benefit from gun legislation as well would they not? A walrus could be running Baltimore and Federal gun Legislation would still make a difference.

    posted by Rusty

    Friday, 07/01/2022

  • Is the writer of this tripe concerned about the daily shootings, killings, lawlessness and violence throughout the major cities run by the Democrats? Didn't think so.

    posted by Hal Stroham

    Friday, 07/01/2022

Smokey Mountain News Logo
SUPPORT THE SMOKY MOUNTAIN NEWS AND
INDEPENDENT, AWARD-WINNING JOURNALISM
Go to top
Payment Information

/

At our inception 20 years ago, we chose to be different. Unlike other news organizations, we made the decision to provide in-depth, regional reporting free to anyone who wanted access to it. We don’t plan to change that model. Support from our readers will help us maintain and strengthen the editorial independence that is crucial to our mission to help make Western North Carolina a better place to call home. If you are able, please support The Smoky Mountain News.

The Smoky Mountain News is a wholly private corporation. Reader contributions support the journalistic mission of SMN to remain independent. Your support of SMN does not constitute a charitable donation. If you have a question about contributing to SMN, please contact us.